Whatever Happened To The $400 Designer Shoes?

If you watched a rerun of the Sex and the City episode “Ring-a-ding-ding”, where Carrie is forced to come up with a $40,000 down payment for her apartment, she claims not to have any money while shoe shopping with Miranda.

- Miranda grabs a shoe Carrie held in her hand and says “At $400 a pop, how many of these do you have? Fifty?”
- Carrie frowns, “C’mon…” (she has way more than that!)
- “100?”
- “Would it be bad if I did?” Carrie answers coyly.
- “Well $400 times 100, there’s your down payment,” Miranda says as a matter of fact.
- “Well no, that’s only $4000.” Carrie clearly not strong in math.
- “No, that’s $40,000.”

Carrie gasps. And so do I.

This episode ran during the 2001-2002 season, and 8-9 years later in 2010, the inflation of designer shoe prices have since risen from $400 to $600. Women could only wish designer shoes were $400 “cheap”. Nowadays, $400 can get you a pair from designer bridge collections like Miu Miu, Marc by Marc Jacob, or brands like Diane von Furstenberg. But for couture houses like Yves Saint Laurent,  and popular shoe-designers like Christian Louboutin, Jimmy Choo and Manolo Blahnik, you’re looking to spend at least $600 (sometimes $500 if you’re lucky) up to $1100. Designer boots? Expect to shell out at least $1200 to $2000 (for Alaïa). Recently, Bloomberg wrote that the shoes are the new “it bags”, where women see no problem splurging over a pair of designer sandals.


Above: Azzedine Alaïa booties for $1805 at Net-a-porter.com

Indeed price inflation seems to be inevitable, but paychecks aren’t getting bigger and prices over designer fashion are getting higher. Brands blame that production costs have risen over the years and to keep their profits, they must raise prices. It’s even harder for publicly traded brands to keep prices low as investors expect better sales than the previous year. There are a number of factors that can contribute to inflation, and though understandable, let’s not discount that greed aka profit plays a huge role in this. I don’t really believe the quality of shoes have gone up over time, in fact I think they’ve gone down and production time has gone down as well. These days, hand crafted goods are just “too expensive”.

Are we led to believe that eventually we’d have to shell out over $1000 for a pair of designer shoes by 2020? I already have a hard time paying for a single pair of basic Christian Louboutin pumps, let alone spend $1000 of my hard earned money on a designer shoe that doesn’t have a long shelf life. Is it any wonder the public is turning towards cheaper goods? Cheap fashion will still perpetuate if designer brands keep their prices high.

So, the conundrum is this: do we buy designer shoes now, as expensive as it is, in the risk to avoid paying more in the future? Or do we restrain ourselves and save up until you can afford some and/or hope to have a better salary in the future?

Share

3 Responses to “Whatever Happened To The $400 Designer Shoes?”

  1. Ms. P & C Says:

    Fantastic post. I’ve been noticing the insane numbers on the bottom of display shoes lately, and since I don’t have nearly the income I used to (independent contractor still starting out), I have to pass more & more frequently. Luckily, I do find options on sale here & there, but they are typically in the contemporary range rather than designer. (For instance, Elizabeth & James or Jeffrey Campbell.)

    You should read Dana Thomas’ book “Deluxe – How Luxury Lost It’s Luster” if you haven’t already. She writes about how greed has almost wiped out craftsmanship in the fashion world; ever since the dawn of LVMH, artistry has taken a back seat to dividends. It’s those with zero appreciation of true fashion & craftsmanship that enter the fashion world because they think it’s “fun” and will make them a quick buck. They don’t even realize that because of them, the industry is sounding a death knell to creativity and traditional craftsmanship.

  2. Dahlia Says:

    Indeed I have read “Deluxe” and what a fantastic read it was. Ever since the fashion has been “democratized” to the public, fast fashion companies have taken advantage of the 6 months production time inbetween collections to whip out similar designs faster and for a much cheaper price, along with China’s low production cost, the combination has undone all the hard work and craftsmanship of fashion designers. And in order for fashion designers to stay above the fold, they have to raise prices, though I think only to make a profit rather than upping the craftsmanship of their clothes and shoes.

    It’s really sad, but I have another post coming up that will also address that problem of fashion brands marketing to the wrong demographic.

  3. Heidy Says:

    From an entirely financial and economics POV, is this not the fundamental function of our annual pay review? (i.e. absorb the effects of inflation: CPI ^ 1.5%; pay ^ [min.]1.5%, non?

    Please note the above comment is me trying to reply in a v. rational & calm tone because your article does, in fact, scare the hell out of me as I too my lux and shoes :) , however is this not at least what you should be expecting from one’s employer? I mean, again with the rationalising: how does a economy expect to keep its economic ‘equilibrium’ if prices keep going up but our incomes do not (at least) rise proportionately.

Leave a Reply